Phony advertising at its worst
Years
ago I made up a list of my top ten movies and when I finished it and
examined it I was startled to find that it was dominated by Italians
and Italian-Americans. The list included The
Godfather, Part 11
and Apocalypse Now
(Coppola of
course), La Strada
(Fellini), Mean
Streets (Scorsese)
plus Mr. Smith Goes
to Washington and
It's A Wonderful
Life, two films
directed by an American born in Sicily, Frank Capra. Six out of the
ten films thus had an Italian element to them and the other four were
Who's Afraid of
Virginia Woolf (Mike
Nichols, a German-American), Fanny
and Alexander
(Bergman, Swedish) and One
Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest
and Amadeus
(so the Czechs, in the form of Milos Forman, also did quite well).
Though
my top ten might look a little different now - films like Heat
and A
One and A Two would
be vying for a place in there - these ten films would still make my
top 20 at least and they all still seem to me far superior to Citizen
Kane and Vertigo,
the two movies that excited so much comment and comparison when the
latter overtook the former as No.1 in the 2012 Sight & Sound poll
of best ever films. To me those two and other high-placing perennials
of that list like La
Règle Du Jeu, 2001: A Space Odyssey, Potemkin and
The Searchers are
all great, but they don’t quite have the raw power needed to make
them personal favourites of mine.
The
films that really do it for me, whether it is due to the input of
Italians or not, all have a very strong emotional element to them.
Now the term ‘emotional’ is of course a dirty word in film
criticism because it’s often taken to be a sign of manipulative
film-making, of a facile director pushing buttons to make those
tear-ducts well up. Even for those of us who are not ashamed to say
we cry at movies, this question of what is real emotion and what is
falsely contrived can be a very vexed one, since individuals have
such divergent reactions. Steven Spielberg sometimes gets accused of
being manipulative and E.T.
for example has always left me with completely dry eyes. On the other
hand there are parts of Saving
Private Ryan that
get me every time. The tragic young deaths in movies such as Terms
of Endearment, Titanic and
Million Dollar Baby
didn’t move me
much, yet Tokyo Story
really affected me, as did cartoons like Grave
of the Fireflies and
Toy Story 3.
When
it comes to the films in that old top ten of mine, however, most of
which did indeed make me cry, I consider them to be in a realm so
elevated that if anyone mentioned the term ‘button-pushing’ in
connection with them, I would think of that person as a completely
obtuse horse’s ass. It’s not the way I experienced them at all,
and they seem far more powerful, and far less saccharine, than such a
term implies. Watching those films it felt to me like I experienced a
higher reality, and I finally reacted with tears only because by that
point I was in a state of wonder and awe.
These films are properly ‘operatic’ (there’s that Italian connection again) in that they create mood upon mood upon mood until the cumulative effect is overwhelming. And while I’ve never had that experience whilst listening to an actual opera, I’m guessing it’s similar to the extreme emotion an opera-lover feels when he hears a very beautiful and dramatic aria. Apparently this is what happens sometimes and grown men do cry when they listen to Verdi et al in a public setting. I know this because I’ve seen it in movies - movies like The Untouchables, directed by Italian-American Brian De Palma. There it’s De Niro as Al Capone doing the weeping (while he’s simultaneously having Sean Connery’s cop character murdered) but no one said you have to be a saint to have these feelings…
These films are properly ‘operatic’ (there’s that Italian connection again) in that they create mood upon mood upon mood until the cumulative effect is overwhelming. And while I’ve never had that experience whilst listening to an actual opera, I’m guessing it’s similar to the extreme emotion an opera-lover feels when he hears a very beautiful and dramatic aria. Apparently this is what happens sometimes and grown men do cry when they listen to Verdi et al in a public setting. I know this because I’ve seen it in movies - movies like The Untouchables, directed by Italian-American Brian De Palma. There it’s De Niro as Al Capone doing the weeping (while he’s simultaneously having Sean Connery’s cop character murdered) but no one said you have to be a saint to have these feelings…
So
having said all that, it’s ironic that, after watching Nanni
Moretti’s We Have A
Pope recently, it
struck me how bad Italian cinema has been for a long time. Even
though most of that top 10 were Italian-American rather than strictly
Italian, there’s no doubt that in the 50’s, 60’s and 70’s
there were many interesting directors in Italy. I’m not a fan of
Pasolini or, generally, Antonioni, and I think Fellini was very
uneven, but still there were brilliant films like Fellini's two best works, La
Strada and Amarcord, plus Visconti’s Rocco
and His Brothers
(1960) and Bertolucci’s The
Conformist (1971).
Since then, however, it seems like a wasteland.
I quite liked Moretti as a director before this latest film: Dear Diary was a fun piece of fluff and The Son’s Room is the one really excellent Italian film I’ve seen from the last 30 years. Plus he’s a really likeable performer. But We Have A Pope was an embarrassing mess. Firstly, there’s not enough of him in it. It was sold on the ‘Pope meets psychiatrist’ angle, with Moretti as the latter, yet they have hardly any scenes together. Instead the Pope goes wandering around Rome incognito. He doesn’t really do or say anything of consequence. He meets a theatre troupe but that’s just an excuse to quote a lot of lines from Chekhov, as if the screenwriters despaired of their own words and thought this might save them. Meanwhile back at the Vatican all the cardinals have a volleyball tournament. It’s done in a really lame way, and the ending of the film is a total damp squib.
I quite liked Moretti as a director before this latest film: Dear Diary was a fun piece of fluff and The Son’s Room is the one really excellent Italian film I’ve seen from the last 30 years. Plus he’s a really likeable performer. But We Have A Pope was an embarrassing mess. Firstly, there’s not enough of him in it. It was sold on the ‘Pope meets psychiatrist’ angle, with Moretti as the latter, yet they have hardly any scenes together. Instead the Pope goes wandering around Rome incognito. He doesn’t really do or say anything of consequence. He meets a theatre troupe but that’s just an excuse to quote a lot of lines from Chekhov, as if the screenwriters despaired of their own words and thought this might save them. Meanwhile back at the Vatican all the cardinals have a volleyball tournament. It’s done in a really lame way, and the ending of the film is a total damp squib.
We
Have A Pope got
quite good reviews. But then so did Gomorrah
and Il Divo
and Le Quattro Volte.
These three in fact got excellent reviews. Yet Gomorrah
was over-rated, Il
Divo was a bore and
Le Quattro Volte
was one of the most ludicrously unwatchable films ever made.
Don’t Move
was an Italian film from 2004 and that too was kind of dry and pointless. Then there was Roberto Benigni's Life Is Beautiful (1997), widely regarded as the worst film to ever win a major Oscar. British cinema was famously scorned by
Francois Truffaut, who said that the words ‘British’ and ‘cinema’
didn’t deserve to be in the same sentence together. But in recent
decades it has had Mike Leigh, Ken Loach, Michael Winterbottom and Danny Boyle amongst others, without even including the many Brits
who make movies exclusively in the US, like Christopher Nolan and
Ridley Scott. And France of course always has interesting things
going on in its cinema.
But the last really interesting Italian
director was Bernardo Bertolucci, and he hasn’t made a good film
since The Last
Emperor (1987). His
more recent films like Stealing
Beauty and The
Dreamers simply
confirm the decline of Italian cinema. I may be being a little unfair
because I only know the Italian films that win international renown
and I have certainly seen more recent British movies - but when even
the most acclaimed
Italian movies are all bad, it seems to me there must be something
going wrong. Is it that Italian writers and directors don’t try
anymore because they think their country already has enough beautiful
art? Is complacency the problem? Or has Berlusconi’s reign
corrupted the cultural landscape? Are his TV stations to blame? What
is it exactly? It seems very strange that a country with such a rich
cinematic history is not doing a lot better.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.